Back to resources

Build vs. Buy Debt Collection Software: What the Data Actually Shows

Roughly 70% of custom software projects fail to deliver as planned, running over budget, missing deadlines, or getting cut down in scope before launch. One major auto manufacturer spent two years and $5 million trying to build a single module of a new collections system before scrapping the build entirely and switching to a preconfigured platform instead.

Debt collection is a deceptively complex domain. It covers payment splits, interest accrual, NSF handling, bankruptcy and hardship workflows, third-party placement and commissions. Teams that try to build or customize their way into this usually underestimate what it actually takes, and so do most CRM vendors pitching a "good enough" fit.

This brief breaks down why buying a purpose-built, preconfigured debt collection platform consistently beats building or customizing one, and what it's cost (and saved) real collections teams who've made that call.

About the author

Chris Smith

Having spent his entire career in the credit and collections space, Chris Smith started out building and implementing collection strategies before leading product teams. Now the Vice President of Product at C&R Software, he supports organizations in a variety of countries and industries achieve their ROI goals. Chris is an analytically-driven product leader, specializing in defining and executing product strategy and positioning to drive business growth.

Back to resources
Share this article:
Buy, Don’t Build or Customize Your Collection and Recovery Platform
Free Download

Download the full Executive Brief


Let’s keep the conversation going!

We’ll be adding thought-provoking content and insights on a regular basis. Let’s stay in touch!